Direct Violation

Latest Reviews


“I had an amazing experience working with Michael Kotik. They were professional, knowledgeable, and truly dedicated to my case! The communication was always clear and timely. I felt supported throughout the entire process of my case. Thanks to their expertise and dedication, we achieved a great outcome. Highly recommended for anyone in need of reliable legal representation! Michael is an absolute shark !! We can’t thank him enough.” – Client X


“I can’t thank Michael enough for his incredible dedication and expertise throughout my case.


From the very first consultation, he made me feel heard and reassured. Michael explained everything clearly, kept me informed at every step, and truly fought for the best outcome. He didn’t talk down to me, didn’t sugarcoat anything, just kept it real and guided me through every step. He made a stressful situation way more manageable, and I always felt like I was in good hands.


If you’re looking for someone who knows the system inside and out and actually cares about your outcome, Michael is the person you want in your corner. Hands down the best!” – Client Y

A direct violation occurs when someone on probation or parole commits a new crime or is convicted of one after supervision begins. Unlike technical violations—which break supervision rules without a new crime—direct violations trigger harsher enforcement and often more serious consequences.

In Pennsylvania Courts, direct violations of parole are governed by statutes like 61 Pa. C.S. § 6138 and regulations under the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. The rules ensure there is a process for preliminary hearings, violation hearings, and potential revocation when someone is convicted (or pleads guilty/nolo contendere) of a new offense while under supervision.

New Jersey Courts also allows for supervisory revocation when new criminal convictions occur during parole, or as part of probation/parole conditions. (While explicit statute references are less immediately accessible by state government pages in this set, NJ parole board rules and courts broadly recognize that new convictions while under supervision are “direct violations.”)


How a Direct Violation Works

Here is a comparison of how direct violations are handled in PA and NJ, what processes apply, and what consequences may follow:

AspectPennsylvaniaNew Jersey*
Definition of Direct ViolationWhen a parolee commits a new crime (or is convicted) during the period of supervision or while delinquent on supervision. Similar: supervision violation due to conviction of a new offense (felony or misdemeanor), or other substantive criminal wrongdoing while under parole/probation.
Triggering the ProcessA conviction or guilty plea (or nolo contendere) in a court of record triggers revocation hearing. The PA Parole Board initiates proceedings. In NJ, parole board or probation authorities may lodge a warrant, schedule a hearing, revoke supervision when direct violation is confirmed.
Procedures & RightsUnder PA law (37 Pa. Code § 71.2 & 61 Pa. C.S.), the parolee is entitled to a preliminary hearing (usually within 14 days of detention under a Board warrant) and a violation hearing (often within 120 days), notice of charges, right to counsel, to present evidence and witnesses, to cross-examine, etc. NJ supervises similar due process rights in parole revocation: notice, hearing before board or panel, right to counsel, presentation of evidence.
Consequences / SanctionsIf found to have committed a direct violation, the parole may be revoked. The parolee may lose credit for time spent on parole, may be recommitted to prison, or subject to penalties under recommitment ranges. PA has guidelines for recommitment ranges that consider seriousness of offense, risk, etc. In NJ, revocation typically results in re-incarceration or being returned to custody. There may also be intermediate consequences depending on offense severity, history, and board discretion.
Effect on Time Served / CreditIn PA, when a direct violation occurs (new crime), the parolee may have the time on parole stripped (no credit for time on parole during violation) in many cases. NJ parole rules generally do not allow credit for time while violating supervision in many cases, particularly when new crimes are involved.

*Note: New Jersey procedures vary by county and specific parole or probation program; consulting NJ statutes or the state Parole Board for the exact rules in your area is important.


What Lawyer Michael Kotik Can Do

When you are facing a direct violation, Michael Kotik can help by:

Evaluating whether you are properly under supervision and whether the new offense qualifies as a direct violation under applicable law

Ensuring you receive all required legal notices, hearings, and rights (right to counsel, meaningful hearing, discovery, etc.)

Challenging whether the new conviction (or plea) was valid, whether evidence meets the required burden, and whether any procedural missteps occurred

Advocating to minimize or defeat revocation—arguing for credit for time on parole if applicable, seeking reduced penalties or negotiating terms

Representing you in both preliminary hearings and full violation hearings, cross-examining witnesses and presenting your defense


FAQs About a Direct Violation

Q: What makes a violation “direct” instead of “technical”?

A: A direct violation involves being convicted (or pleading guilty) of a new crime while under supervision, or committing an offense that leads to a formal criminal charge, rather than simply breaking supervision rules (like missing appointments or curfew).

Q: Can a direct violation result in immediate returns to prison?

A: Yes. If you are convicted of a new offense while under supervision, the supervising authority (probation or parole board) may revoke your supervision and require you to serve the remainder of the original sentence, especially under statutes governing revocation.

Q: Do I have a right to counsel in a direct violation hearing?

A: In Pennsylvania, yes—you are entitled to counsel, notice, and other due process protections in direct violation proceedings. In NJ, your rights to representation still apply in revocation hearings when new criminal charges are involved (though you should confirm the rules for your specific county or program).

Q: Will time spent on parole count if I get revoked for a direct violation?

A: Often, time on parole during the violation period is not credited toward the sentence when a direct violation leads to revocation. The parole board or judge may strip that credit, depending on the offense and statute.

Q: What kinds of new crimes trigger direct violations?

A: Any criminal conviction can trigger it—felonies, serious misdemeanors, or in some states even certain lower-level offenses, depending on the parole/probation conditions and statute. Behavior that leads to a conviction (not just an arrest) is what usually matters.


Contact Lawyer Michael Kotik

If you are accused of a direct violation—having been convicted of a new crime while on probation or parole—or facing revocation proceedings, it’s essential to contact an attorney immediately to safeguard your rights.

Phone: 267-265-4553
Email: michael.kotik@gmail.com


Disclaimer

This page is intended for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and procedures surrounding direct violations differ by county and state, and statutes and case law can change. Consult with an attorney who is familiar with the laws in your specific jurisdiction (Pennsylvania or New Jersey) for advice tailored to your situation.